法律语言研究所
设为首页  |  加入收藏
 专业委员会  组织机构  秘书处  活动安排  资源下载  研究所  概况介绍  学术研究  人才培养  研究平台  学生园地  资源共享 
 Discourse Information 
 语篇信息理论 
 法律语料库 
 法律语言学实验室 
Application
当前位置: 首页>>研究所>>研究平台>>Discourse Information>>Application>>正文
 
Forensic Psycholinguistics(Yu Xinbing)
2013年12月04日 Yu Xinbing 

 

The Application of Forensic Psycholinguistics Research

The professionals from both theory and practice fields in China have always been deepening their understanding of evidence. For instance, the wording differs from “there are six forms of evidence” in the 1979 Criminal Procedure Code and “there are seven forms of evidence” in the 1996 Criminal Procedure Code, which are considered a kind of close listing and thus ruling out the possibility of other forms of evidence, to “the evidence includes”, which appears in the 2012 Criminal Procedure Code and is deemed open to include evidence other than the eight forms listed in the stipulation as long as it gains sufficient justification with the development of science and technology. The evidence drawn from forensic psycholinguistics research falls in the potential range.

The polygraph technology, as a dominant form of forensic psychological tests, has attracted attention from both professionals and laypeople, for it seems the only way out of a forensic situation in which the parties involved have competing descriptions of the facts in the case. Unfortunately, the polygraph test results, subject to the influence of personnel, equipment and environment, can not assure a stable error rate, which makes it short of the Daubert Criteria and can not be accepted as evidence in the court. Nowadays, the polygraph technology primarily works in the investigation process.

We assume that the polygraph technology may function better to construct the evidence information, if integrated with discourse information analysis(Du, 2002,2007,2009,2010) based on the language in the judicial process and that is the aim of our lab.

 

References

DU Jinbang 2002. An overview of the research of forensic psycholinguistics [J]. Modern Foreign Languages (1).

DU Jinbang 2007. A study of the tree information structure of legal discourse [J]. Modern Foreign Languages (1).

DU Jinbang 2009. Information flow in discourse [J].  Journal of Foreign Languages (3).

DU Jinbang 2010. A study on legal facts constructed via courtroom dialogue [J]. Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies (2).

关闭窗口
联系我们 | 关于我们 | 后台管理 | 版权声明

Copyright©2007 -2017  All Rights Reserved  版权所有 法律语言学研究网